The agent will frame every sub-question, retrieval pass, and the final brief to argue for the selected party, identifying weaknesses in the opposing position and citing Lovdata statutes, ECHR judgments, and Bufdir guidance.
Both engines run on AWS Bedrock via Claude. Most of the time is spent on multiple question-answering passes — 6–10 sub-questions each requiring a full retrieval and answer cycle. Haiku is faster and handles most cases well. Sonnet produces a more thorough brief with deeper ECHR precedent analysis and stronger multi-party argumentation.
Corpus slices
Three core legal slices are on by default. Enable ECHR Article 9, Hague Convention, Norwegian Courts, Bufdir guidance, or DBN Resources for more targeted research.
Barneloven, custody, samvær, mediation
Barnevern, omsorgsovertakelse, foster care
Art. 8 family life, Art. 9 religion, HUDOC vs Norway
INCADAT, cross-border abduction, wrongful removal
Høyesterett + Lagmannsrett family decisions
Bufdir, Barneombudet, Statsforvalteren guidance
Arbeidsmiljøloven, NOUer, statutes, government background
Do Better Norge guides, flashcards, resource directory
Drop case files here, or browse
PDF, DOCX, TXT — up to 5 files — chunked + embedded in memory only, never stored.
The agent will research these angles against the corpus. Edit any question before running to steer retrieval.
Select who you are representing, describe the dispute, and optionally upload case documents. The agent will argue your side — identifying supporting statutes, ECHR judgments, and weaknesses in the opposing position.
Source