/* Real data sourced from dobetternorge.no
   Used by the tool views to back every claim with a real citation. */

window.DBN_DATA = {
  /* ── Header stats ──────────────────────────────────────────────── */
  stats: {
    echrViolations: 23,
    echrLossRate: 64,           // % ECHR cases lost 2017-22
    tribunalDecisions: 1731,
    pendingStrasbourg: 20,
    members: 9482,
    memberTarget: 20000,
    targetDate: "Dec 2026",
  },

  /* ── ECHR cases against Norway ─────────────────────────────────── */
  cases: [
    {
      no: "01",
      name: "Strand Lobben & Others v. Norway",
      year: 2019,
      ruling: "Art. 8",
      summary: "Adoption by foster parents authorised despite biological mother's objections. Contact limited to 4-6 hrs/yr.",
      chamber: "Grand Chamber",
      vote: "13–4",
    },
    {
      no: "02",
      name: "Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway",
      year: 2021,
      ruling: "Art. 8 + 9",
      summary: "Somali mother; authorities failed to consider religious upbringing before authorising adoption by Christian foster parents.",
      chamber: "Grand Chamber",
      vote: "Unanimous",
    },
    {
      no: "03",
      name: "A.S. v. Norway",
      year: 2019,
      ruling: "Art. 8",
      summary: "Long-term foster placement treated as permanent from outset; parenting assessment based on vague, subjective criteria.",
      chamber: "Chamber",
      vote: "Unanimous",
    },
    {
      no: "04",
      name: "Pedersen & Others v. Norway",
      year: 2020,
      ruling: "Art. 8",
      summary: "Contact between parents and child reduced to two short visits per year. Strict regime of visits cemented separation.",
      chamber: "Chamber",
      vote: "6–1",
    },
    {
      no: "05",
      name: "Hernehult v. Norway",
      year: 2020,
      ruling: "Art. 8",
      summary: "Emergency removal of three children. Insufficient evidentiary basis and inadequate reunification efforts.",
      chamber: "Chamber",
      vote: "Unanimous",
    },
    {
      no: "06",
      name: "K.O. & V.M. v. Norway",
      year: 2019,
      ruling: "Art. 8",
      summary: "Restrictions on contact after care order not supported by convincing reasons; authorities failed the reunification duty.",
      chamber: "Chamber",
      vote: "Unanimous",
    },
    {
      no: "07",
      name: "Johansen v. Norway",
      year: 1996,
      ruling: "Art. 8",
      summary: "Mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other's company is a fundamental element of family life.",
      chamber: "Chamber",
      vote: "12–5",
    },
  ],

  /* ── Contact-visit benchmarks (visits/year after care order) ───── */
  contactBenchmarks: [
    { jurisdiction: "Norway",        visits: "4–6",  note: "post-removal regime" },
    { jurisdiction: "Sweden",        visits: "12",   note: "comparable Nordic" },
    { jurisdiction: "Germany",       visits: "24",   note: "EU benchmark" },
    { jurisdiction: "Poland",        visits: "26+",  note: "EU benchmark" },
    { jurisdiction: "ECHR benchmark",visits: "~40",  note: "Art. 8 jurisprudence" },
  ],

  /* ── Voices ───────────────────────────────────────────────────── */
  voices: [
    {
      initials: "EK",
      name: "Elena K.",
      role: "Polish mother — case before Oslo tingrett",
      quote: "The meeting lasted less than a quarter of an hour. I was told I could see my daughter four times a year, two hours each time. Three years later they said she no longer had a bond with me. I am still her mother.",
    },
    {
      initials: "TR",
      name: "Tomasz R.",
      role: "Verified member · 2023",
      quote: "Fathers are treated as secondary caregivers by default. My lawyer warned me before the first meeting: Do not expect to be heard. She was right.",
    },
    {
      initials: "GT",
      name: "Gro Hillestad Thune",
      role: "Former ECHR judge (17 yrs)",
      quote: "This is an extremely serious warning from Strasbourg to the Norwegian authorities. We are talking about a systemic failure, not individual mistakes.",
    },
    {
      initials: "SS",
      name: "Stephanos Stavros",
      role: "Human rights lawyer, Council of Europe",
      quote: "It is much easier in Norway for child welfare to take children from their parents and cut any contact than to have a real reunification plan. The Court is deeply critical of this.",
    },
  ],

  /* ── International instruments cited across the tools ──────────── */
  instruments: [
    { code: "ECHR Art. 8",    full: "European Convention on Human Rights, Article 8 — Right to respect for private and family life" },
    { code: "ECHR Art. 9",    full: "European Convention on Human Rights, Article 9 — Freedom of thought, conscience and religion" },
    { code: "ECHR Art. 6",    full: "European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6 — Right to a fair trial" },
    { code: "ECHR Art. 14",   full: "European Convention on Human Rights, Article 14 — Prohibition of discrimination" },
    { code: "UNCRC Art. 3",   full: "UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 3 — Best interests of the child" },
    { code: "UNCRC Art. 9",   full: "UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 9 — Separation from parents" },
    { code: "UNCRC Art. 12",  full: "UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 12 — Right of the child to be heard" },
    { code: "ICCPR Art. 23",  full: "International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights, Article 23 — Protection of the family" },
    { code: "EU CFR Art. 24", full: "EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 24 — Rights of the child" },
    { code: "EU CFR Art. 7",  full: "EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 7 — Respect for private and family life" },
    { code: "Barneloven §31", full: "Lov om barn og foreldre §31 — Child's right to be heard from age 7; great weight from age 12" },
    { code: "Barneloven §42", full: "Lov om barn og foreldre §42 — Samværsrett ved samlivsbrudd (contact rights)" },
    { code: "Barneloven §43", full: "Lov om barn og foreldre §43 — Avtale eller avgjerd om samvær (contact agreement)" },
    { code: "Barnevernloven §4-19", full: "Lov om barnevernstjenester §4-19 — Samvær etter omsorgsovertakelse" },
  ],

  /* ── Headline variants (used by Tweaks: headline_variant) ──────── */
  headlines: {
    twelve: {
      eyebrow: "Family rights · Norway · since 2019",
      title: "They took her child in twelve minutes.",
      sub: "Open a tool. Every answer is cited. Every claim cross-checked.",
    },
    twentythree: {
      eyebrow: "European Court of Human Rights · 2015 – present",
      title: "Twenty-three violations. Every one says the same.",
      sub: "Article 8. Family life. Norway, condemned in Strasbourg.",
    },
    members: {
      eyebrow: "9,482 of 20,000 · target Dec 2026",
      title: "Numbers are how courts listen.",
      sub: "Every member is one more reason the Storting cannot look away.",
    },
    compliance: {
      eyebrow: "Oslo Syndrome · investigative series",
      title: "Compliance is love. Trust the process.",
      sub: "This workbench asks what happens when the process becomes the story.",
    },
  },
};
