export type NorwayImage = {
  src: string;
  alt: string;
  credit: string;
  sourceUrl: string;
  sourceLabel: string;
  note?: string;
};

export type NorwayCase = {
  title: string;
  date: string;
  href: string;
  sourceLabel: string;
  summary: string;
  significance: string;
};

export type NorwayOrganization = {
  name: string;
  href: string;
  strap: string;
  summary: string;
};

export const norwayFeature = {
  eyebrow: "Section 09 / Norway",
  title: "Family life, fathers, immigration, and the long Norwegian argument over Article 8.",
  lede:
    "This month’s Norway feature sits where advocacy, rights language, and lived family conflict meet: Do Better Norge’s campaign line, fathers’ rights groups, immigrant-family anxiety, and the official Strasbourg record against Norway.",
  note:
    "The argument here is deliberately two-track: advocacy claims are identified as advocacy, while the legal spine is anchored to official European Court of Human Rights material.",
};

export const norwayArticle = {
  title: "April 2026: Norway's Family-Life Problem Still Has Faces, Fathers, and a Court Record",
  publishedAt: "2026-04-06 10:20:00",
  excerpt:
    "A Norway dispatch about Do Better Norge, fathers' rights, immigrant families, and the official Article 8 case law showing why the argument over family life has not gone away.",
};

export const norwayImages: NorwayImage[] = [
  {
    src: "https://dobetternorge.no/images/humanRightsCollision.jpeg",
    alt: "Do Better Norge infographic about ECHR judgments and visitation in Norwegian child welfare.",
    credit: "Do Better Norge",
    sourceUrl: "https://dobetternorge.no/images/humanRightsCollision.jpeg",
    sourceLabel: "Do Better Norge",
    note:
      "Used to frame the article's central tension between legal standards, contact rights, and what advocacy groups say happens in practice.",
  },
  {
    src: "https://dobetternorge.no/images/echrIntervention.jpeg",
    alt: "Do Better Norge infographic about ECHR intervention and Norway's child-welfare case pattern.",
    credit: "Do Better Norge",
    sourceUrl: "https://dobetternorge.no/images/echrIntervention.jpeg",
    sourceLabel: "Do Better Norge",
    note:
      "Used as a visual bridge between Strasbourg case law and Norway's domestic reunification debate.",
  },
  {
    src: "https://dobetternorge.no/uploads/infographics/norwayLaw-vs-ECHR.png",
    alt: "Infographic comparing Norwegian law and ECHR Article 8 family reunification principles.",
    credit: "Do Better Norge",
    sourceUrl: "https://dobetternorge.no/uploads/infographics/norwayLaw-vs-ECHR.png",
    sourceLabel: "Do Better Norge",
    note:
      "Useful for the article's law-versus-practice section because it visualizes the reunification versus stability conflict directly.",
  },
  {
    src: "https://dobetternorge.no/images/theBlackBox.jpeg",
    alt: "Do Better Norge infographic about evidence, bias, and cultural blindness in Norwegian child welfare.",
    credit: "Do Better Norge",
    sourceUrl: "https://dobetternorge.no/images/theBlackBox.jpeg",
    sourceLabel: "Do Better Norge",
    note:
      "Selected for the immigrant-family section because it explicitly depicts cultural blindness and interpretive bias as advocacy concerns.",
  },
];

export const norwayCases: NorwayCase[] = [
  {
    title: "Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway",
    date: "10 September 2019",
    href: "https://www.echr.coe.int/w/strand-lobben-and-others-v.-norway-no.-37283/13-",
    sourceLabel: "ECHR case page",
    summary:
      "Grand Chamber case concerning forced adoption and the severing of legal ties between mother and child.",
    significance:
      "The core signal was that reunification must remain the ultimate aim where possible and that permanently cutting family ties demands exceptional justification.",
  },
  {
    title: "K.O. and V.M. v. Norway",
    date: "19 November 2019",
    href: "https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf?filename=Judgment+K.O.+and+V.M.+v.+Norway+-+placement+in+foster+care+and+contact+rights.pdf&id=003-6566150-8690597&library=ECHR",
    sourceLabel: "ECHR press release",
    summary:
      "The Court found no Article 8 violation in the placement itself, but did find a violation in the parents' contact regime.",
    significance:
      "That split matters: the recurring Norway problem is often not only removal, but low-contact decisions that let separation harden into estrangement.",
  },
  {
    title: "Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway",
    date: "10 December 2021",
    href: "https://www.echr.coe.int/w/abdi-ibrahim-v.-norway-no.-15379/16-",
    sourceLabel: "ECHR case page",
    summary:
      "Grand Chamber case about adoption by a foster family against the wishes of a Somali Muslim mother.",
    significance:
      "The Court held that Norway had not given sufficient weight to the family's cultural and religious background, making this one of the clearest immigrant-family Article 8 judgments.",
  },
  {
    title: "A.L. and Others v. Norway",
    date: "20 January 2022",
    href: "https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?filename=Two+judgments+concerning+care+orders+for+children+in+Norway.pdf&id=003-7235635-9843609&library=ECHR",
    sourceLabel: "ECHR press release",
    summary:
      "Case involving Norwegian and Slovak family members and the handling of a care order plus restricted parental contact.",
    significance:
      "The Court found that the child had effectively been set on a foster-care trajectory without proper consideration of alternatives or genuine reconciliation work.",
  },
  {
    title: "Country profile: Norway parental-rights line",
    date: "Updated July 2024",
    href: "https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/CP_Norway_ENG",
    sourceLabel: "ECHR country profile",
    summary:
      "The Court's official Norway profile groups together child-welfare, parental-rights, and immigration-family-life cases.",
    significance:
      "It records that on 14 September 2023 the Court dealt with 21 Norway public-care applications, declaring 12 inadmissible and finding Article 8 violations in nine others.",
  },
];

export const norwayOrganizations: NorwayOrganization[] = [
  {
    name: "Do Better Norge",
    href: "https://dobetternorge.no/",
    strap: "rights education, reform pressure, and family-life advocacy",
    summary:
      "The site presents itself as a practical route for families navigating custody, contact, child-welfare process, and Article 8 questions, with guides, infographics, videos, and reform arguments.",
  },
  {
    name: "MannsForum",
    href: "https://mannsforum.no/kontaktinformasjon-mannsforum/",
    strap: "boys, fathers, and men's equality voice",
    summary:
      "MannsForum describes itself as Norway's largest membership-based equality organization focused on boys, fathers, and men, which makes it a natural bridge into the fathers' rights side of the debate.",
  },
  {
    name: "Foreningen 2 Foreldre",
    href: "https://www.f2f.no/",
    strap: "children with two homes, shared-parenting culture",
    summary:
      "F2F's own framing is concise and revealing: safe family conditions for children with two homes, which is almost a thesis statement for the contact-and-continuity side of the article.",
  },
];

export const norwaySources = [
  {
    label: "ECHR country profile for Norway",
    href: "https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/CP_Norway_ENG",
    note:
      "Used for the official summary of Norway parental-rights and immigration-family-life judgments, including the 2023 line on 21 public-care applications.",
  },
  {
    label: "ECHR case page: Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway",
    href: "https://www.echr.coe.int/w/strand-lobben-and-others-v.-norway-no.-37283/13-",
    note:
      "Used for the Grand Chamber adoption and reunification reference point that reshaped the Norway debate.",
  },
  {
    label: "ECHR case page: Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway",
    href: "https://www.echr.coe.int/w/abdi-ibrahim-v.-norway-no.-15379/16-",
    note:
      "Used for the cultural and religious identity dimension in foster-care and adoption decisions.",
  },
  {
    label: "ECHR press release: K.O. and V.M. v. Norway",
    href: "https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf?filename=Judgment+K.O.+and+V.M.+v.+Norway+-+placement+in+foster+care+and+contact+rights.pdf&id=003-6566150-8690597&library=ECHR",
    note:
      "Used for the contact-rights holding and the distinction between the placement decision and the visitation regime.",
  },
  {
    label: "ECHR press release: A.L. and Others v. Norway / E.M. and Others v. Norway",
    href: "https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?filename=Two+judgments+concerning+care+orders+for+children+in+Norway.pdf&id=003-7235635-9843609&library=ECHR",
    note:
      "Used for the 2022 family-reconciliation and long-term foster-care analysis.",
  },
  {
    label: "ECHR press release: 21 applications against Norway concerning children taken into public care",
    href: "https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?filename=21+applications+against+Norway+concerning+children+taken+into+public+care.pdf&id=003-7744629-10718629&library=ECHR",
    note:
      "Used for the official 2023 aggregation of admissibility outcomes and Article 8 violations against Norway.",
  },
  {
    label: "ECHR factsheet: Parental rights",
    href: "https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Parental_ENG.pdf",
    note:
      "Used as the official thematic overview linking Norway decisions into the wider Article 8 parental-rights doctrine.",
  },
  {
    label: "Do Better Norge homepage",
    href: "https://dobetternorge.no/",
    note:
      "Used for the site's self-description, emphasis on Article 8, custody, child welfare, and reform work.",
  },
  {
    label: "MannsForum contact/about page",
    href: "https://mannsforum.no/kontaktinformasjon-mannsforum/",
    note:
      "Used for MannsForum's own description of itself as an organization focused on boys, fathers, and men.",
  },
  {
    label: "Foreningen 2 Foreldre homepage",
    href: "https://www.f2f.no/",
    note:
      "Used for F2F's own framing of children with two homes and shared-family stability.",
  },
];
